Home
 
 
   
Root Canal Necessary?



Question:

History: I'm a 53 yo male with a history of bruxism and clenching (Operating a business, helping rear 5 children and coaching baseball on the side may be a contributing factor??). Started nightly use of a lower teeth orthodic several years back, switched to an upper after crowns on #'s 8 & 9, except for the one year before I replaced the one I lost. Reside north of Atlanta.

I'm now at a cross road regarding an alternative to the expensive cycle of crown -> pin/wear holes in or decay under crown -> root canal -> new crown -> implant. My dentist and I recently discussed a therapy plan, which is to include extractions of #'s 8 & 9 (one crowned, one w/ temp) , an implant at #7, bridgework spanning 7 & 10 (implant 3 yrs ago), plus replacement of 4 crowns.

The significance and expense of this work prompted me to find alt.sci.dentristy this weekend. After reading many posts and replies and googling the archives, it appears most posts and replies are legitimate. Also, I'm sufficiently impressed with the thoughtful and professional replies from the dental professionals who take the time to answer questions to post one myself.

Now, getting to my question. Tooth under old crown on #11 sheared off recently - I'm probably guilty of rocking on my cuspids over the years. There's enough tooth remaining over which a new crown can be placed. My dentist, whom I have used most of my life and have always trusted, but whose advise I have not always promptly followed for financial reasons, referred me to an endodontist for a root canal prior to crown replacement. However, there are none of the prerequisite symptoms Dr. Eichen mentions, i.e., periapical abscess, sensitivity to percussion, dull ache, sensitivity to heat or swelling.


Answer:

You should get an explanation for why the root canal is necessary. I'm getting the impression that the dentist wants the retention from a post in order to hold a crown in place, though you've said "...There's enough tooth remaining over which a new crown can be > placed." Yes, a post can only be placed in a root-canal treated tooth. But if you have a severe grinding problem, putting a long post in a tooth can greatly increase the chances of fracturing your root. It is quite possible I'm inferring something completely wrong about the root canal. It is quite possible a tooth would require root canal without any overt symptoms.

That was precisely my thoughts. Placing a post in the cuspid of a bruxer is an almost sure recipe for a fractured root in the near future. You've made it sound as if he's doing the root canal because the tooth is too short to hold a crown and he needs the additional retention of a post. But, like I (and Steve) said before, posts in cuspids of a bruxer many times leads to a root fracture.

My feeling is that if #11 has insufficient length to hold a crown without a post, then I'd consider having it removed, placing an implant, and splinting the implant to the bridge from #7-10. Otherwise, when and if that root fractures somewhere down the road, you'll be getting a single implant in the area of #11...and will be unable to splint it to any other implants without completely redoing the bridge from #7-10. A single implant in the cuspid region of a bruxer has a lot poorer prognosis than one that is splinted to another implant.

My first choice would be to do a crown on the tooth without a post (if possible), and splint it to a new crown on #12...but only if #12 already has either a large restoration or an existing crown that isn't already part of a bridge.


Rate root canal necessary

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.





 
Privacy Policy